Thomas and Bonaventure distinguished:

It is there, while Thomas and Bonaventure distinguished: deny, if both the possibility of the existence of the world forever on the basis of revelation, Bonaventure never the opportunity, on the basis of reason, too. The idea that the world always has, closes in Bonaventure, is logically absurd. Because if the world is not a beginning, the period is infinite. And it goes against the views of the infinity of time in the world Bonaventure that managers their three main arguments:

1) After Bonaventure: "It's impossible, for inclusion in the infinite." The infinite duration of the world would an infinite number of revolutions of the sun and the moon, and every new day or month would like to have another Revolution...

2) After Bonaventure: "It's impossible, endless order." An infinite past, not the first revolution, and if the first, then no second, and if not the second, then not the third, and so on. But until today we have noticed sequence of days and months.

3) After Bonaventure: "It is impossible, this is infinite." Even an infinite past mean that an unlimited number of rounds have passed, and we came to this. Nevertheless, we succeeded, the revolution, that day and month.