But how, then we must respond, Thomas, that the time should not be seen as a simultaneous existence of these units (sum against the pagans 2.38)? The answer is that the divisibility of time, we must understand it as a simultaneous existence - a collection of units. It is the kind of arithmetic. For the calculation of a sum is still a simultaneous existence of units. What are the time units (hours, years or millennia) or physics (marble, melons or moons), the aggregation of intellectual property in the interest of the measure requires that the units as another substitute. The recent, must be measured, as a simultaneous existence - if this time is also at a point known, for example, the last time that the New York Jets won the Super Bowl, or that the period covers the entire duration in the world. And if we do, however, that in this case such a time should not be "closed", then we are left with a real infinite, in violation of the law does not refuse. This period may not be.
Life can not be infinite if it is a sequence of units closely. The same logic that Thomas includes an infinite size and an infinite amount can be used for an infinite duration. The world from the beginning of time has the evidence, as Bonaventure claim, and not just a question of faith.
Links to my Blogs:
One/ White/ Separated/ Open/ Picture/ Home/ Line/ Mirror/ Negativity/ Lips/ Distract/ Freezzzzzzzz/ Hole/ Nightmares/ Light/ Saint/ Oxygen/ Fire/ Sense/ Soon/ Check/ Space/ Knights/ Come/ Inside Me/ FireWater/ NomedHere/ WHO???/ Anger/ Sensitivity/ Teardrops/ Kills/ Intelligence/ StarField/ Around/ Prevention/ Rain/ STORM/ Suffering/ Emotions/ SENSES/ Heartbreaks/ Love/ Night/ Care/ Unleashed/ SHADOW/ Beginning/ Post/ Attempt/ SeeFury/ alspot/ Eyes/ Bleed/ Post/ Sign/ fall/ Freezzz/ Head/ Roar/ Punch/ guitar/ beer/ blogging/ Surffntheweb/ hotstuff/ neutrals/ rain52508/ avalla/ education/ leadership/ articles/
No comments:
Post a Comment