What do you think about the biginning of the"World"???

The signing of cosmological debate of the last century was the origin of the universe. Two of the main points for support to the hearts and minds of professionals and lay people: the theory of the Big Bang and Steady State Theory. The first, triumphant days, believes that the world began at a time with a unique cataclysmic explosion of matter and space, now largely abandoned, believes that the world is not at the top of the times, he always Den and will always happen.

Amazingly Big Bang-steady-state controversy has a logical sequence in a philosophical debate between medieval scholasticism St. Bonaventure and Saint Thomas Aquinas. Well, sort of. The two Bonaventura and Thomas were Big Bangers in the sense that everybody accepts, as applicable, the first line of Genesis - "In the beginning God created heaven and earth." But Thomas is a contract, De Determinate Mundey and keep it from the beginning of the world can not be demonstrated; logically, only disclosure compels us to believe that the world is not always available. On the other hand, Bonaventure, that the world is logical detectable since the point of view, however - that the world has always existed - can be shown that absurd. In this study, I will argue that Bonaventure was right to the top of the world is in fact demonstrated that the position of Thomas is by its own logic.

But at the beginning, and perhaps counter intuitively, it is necessary to clarify that these two thinkers to hear, "the world". Bonaventure, for example, recognizes the world as something ", according to the non-being". He was indeed the rules a priori the possibility that it's always been. What is important to note, however, he describes the world as identical to be created? Thomas creation referred to as "the result for all and continues: