Assuming for the sake of debate, that the world no beginning has always existed. Not necessarily, then the age of the world would be infinite, it is his age, as measured by a final unity - if minute or hour, year or millennium, could not come whole. For Bonaventure, which is a prima facie case, the opposite: the idea that the world of the age at final, never understand a sentence, the strike also absurd. The absurdity of this proposal, or at least the direction of his absurdity is what underlies his arguments that the infinity can not be added, or by order - and thus may in the world. Thomas finesse Bonaventure three arguments is, in fact, blow into the infinite in size, to stress that we are again in the article to design and produce sections treat themselves as separate entities.
But we have the concept of infinity?
The reasoning is based on Thomas that the time is not all at once, but successively; infinite, it is never upgraded at the same time, it is never all at once here. But the world has an age - what life has also been age to age is that the sum of the units regardless of the length is in. That is, I believe, is the first flaw in the logic of Thomas: Refusal to the duration of the World Infinity as a whole, Thomas denies that the world is a rational age expiable.
No comments:
Post a Comment